Comparative effectiveness research: a progress report.
نویسنده
چکیده
Sixteen months ago, comparative effectiveness research (CER) began its rapid rise, when the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 allocated $1.1 billion for CER. This progress report summarizes how the recipients of the funds-the National Institutes of Health, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and Office of the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services-are spending the $1.1 billion, how the Institute of Medicine priority topics have fared in the agencies' funding programs, and the developing plans for a national CER program. As the United States works to absorb 32 million currently uninsured people into the health care system while simultaneously improving the quality of care and slowing cost increases, CER will increasingly be a necessary component of this change.
منابع مشابه
Comparative-effectiveness research--implications of the Federal Coordinating Council's report.
Institute of Medicine. Initial national priori1. ties for comparative effectiveness research. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, 2009. Iglehart JK. Health insurers and medical2. imaging policy — a work in progress. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1030-7. Avorn J. Debate about funding compara3. tive-effectiveness research. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1927-9. Garber AM, Tunis SR. Does comparative4. effective...
متن کاملComparative effectiveness research: a report from the Institute of Medicine.
On 30 June 2009, another milestone was achieved in progress toward a national system to promote medical research that focuses on decision making by physicians and patients. The first steps occurred in late 2007 and early 2008 with a seminal article (1) and an Institute of Medicine (IOM) report that called for a national initiative of research that would support better decision making about inte...
متن کاملEvaluation of psychotherapy. Efficacy, effectiveness, and patient progress.
Treatment-focused research is concerned with the establishment of the comparative efficacy and effectiveness of clinical interventions, aggregated over groups of patients. The authors introduce and illustrate a new paradigm-patient-focused research-that is concerned with the monitoring of an individual's progress over the course of treatment and the feedback of this information to the practitio...
متن کاملComparative Effectiveness Review Disposition of Comments Report
Research Review Citation: Dahabreh IJ, Moorthy D, Lamont JL, Chen ML, Kent DM, Lau J. Testing of CYP2C19 Variants and Platelet Reactivity for Guiding Antiplatelet Treatment. Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 125. (Prepared by Tufts Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-10055-I.) AHRQ Publication No. 13-EHC117-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality;...
متن کاملPreparing Electronic Clinical Data for Quality Improvement and Comparative Effectiveness Research: The SCOAP CERTAIN Automation and Validation Project
BACKGROUND The field of clinical research informatics includes creation of clinical data repositories (CDRs) used to conduct quality improvement (QI) activities and comparative effectiveness research (CER). Ideally, CDR data are accurately and directly abstracted from disparate electronic health records (EHRs), across diverse health-systems. OBJECTIVE Investigators from Washington State's Sur...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Annals of internal medicine
دوره 153 7 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010